The newspaper publishers decision came after advertisers expressed their anger that NI was charging them auditing fees twice to have advertisements appear in the broadsheet and tabloid editions of the Times.
The Times current gatekeeper rates stand at 498 for a broadsheet page and an extra 388 for the tabloid edition.
A spokesman for the Incorporated Society of British Advertisers (ISBA) said: We are very pleased with NIs decision, its something that we have been campaigning on for several years.
Other repro houses also welcomed the decision, which, from April, means they will be able to deal directly with NI via the artwork delivery system QuickCut.
Network (London) managing director Paul Stonebridge said that it could save his company 100,000 a year. From our perspective its fantastic news. When we handled that work for clients we incurred those charges, so its great news, said Stonebridge.
The only apparent loser is Mullis Morgans News Stream business, the incumbent gatekeeper, although it will still act as a service provider to NI.
In a statement Mullis Morgan Group managing director Keith Green said that the move was a natural progression in an industry that has always been the first to embrace new technology.
However, one industry source suggested that the NI gatekeeper status could be worth around 3m to the Mullis Morgan Group. In October Londons Fusion Group was awarded gatekeeper status for Express Newspapers, replacing Mullis Morgan Group (PrintWeek, 30 October).
While the ISBA welcomed the move it is still concerned about the costs involved in supplying the Independent and Times with an additional reformatted version of the same advert for their tabloid editions.
Story by John Davies
Have your say in the Printweek Poll
Related stories
Latest comments
"Well done all involved... great to see the investment to increase the productivity in the same footprint- much more sustainable than popping another one up."
"From 1949 until the late 2000s Remploy had a network of government-subsidised factories that offered employment specifically to disabled people, originally often war veterans or victims of industrial..."
"Does appear an odd decision as with that level of shareholder funds they would be liable for the staff redundancy and cover the insolvency costs. It’s not like they could take the money and dodge..."
Up next...
Andrew Whyte takes reins
MBO at LT Print Group ensures smooth transition
Educational day in Yorkshire
Northern Stationers see historic print and more in York
Supporting growth in new and existing markets
WTTB backs digital intentions with new e-commerce specialist
Investment in e-commerce fulfilment