A spokesman for the Serious Fraud Office said that the parties would meet next week in front of Judge Rivlin QC at Southwark Crown Court to decide whether there was sufficient public interest for a retrial.
The Crown, represented by Tim Langdale QC, had alleged that Richard Spearman has made 200,000 from the illegal trading of securities.
The defence, led by William Clegg QC, did not dispute that a conspiracy existed or that Richard Spearman had received such information.
However, Clegg argued that Richard Spearman had not been part of the conspiracy in any way, and had not been aware of the illegality of the information.
The information came from an employee of St Ives financial printer Burrups, Norman Payne, who passed on proofs to Richard Spearmans wife Catherine and her business partner Michael Smith.
Price-sensitive documents from Burrups were found at Epping Paving & Supplies, where Catherine Spearman and Michael Smith worked, in 2001 after a covert police operation.
Smith, Payne and Catherine Spearman pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud last year.
by John Davies
Have your say in the Printweek Poll
Related stories
Latest comments
"Following content from the EcoVadis website:
<i>An EcoVadis medal or badge is NOT a certification or an endorsement of a company or its products or services, and it does not indicate that the..."
"Lee De’ath, starting to feel typecast in the insolvency department? Fancy a change in a career? Children's entertainer maybe?"
"Fantastic investment its great to see."
Up next...
Industry's night of nights
Printweek Awards 2025 shortlist revealed
Popular LinkedIn post
Direct mail ‘uniquely effective’, says Ogilvy UK’s Sutherland
Upgrades cut patching more than 50%
Bobst pushes upgrades for Expertcut 106 PER following Drupa reveal
"A fantastic opportunity"