A spokesman for the Serious Fraud Office said that the parties would meet next week in front of Judge Rivlin QC at Southwark Crown Court to decide whether there was sufficient public interest for a retrial.
The Crown, represented by Tim Langdale QC, had alleged that Richard Spearman has made 200,000 from the illegal trading of securities.
The defence, led by William Clegg QC, did not dispute that a conspiracy existed or that Richard Spearman had received such information.
However, Clegg argued that Richard Spearman had not been part of the conspiracy in any way, and had not been aware of the illegality of the information.
The information came from an employee of St Ives financial printer Burrups, Norman Payne, who passed on proofs to Richard Spearmans wife Catherine and her business partner Michael Smith.
Price-sensitive documents from Burrups were found at Epping Paving & Supplies, where Catherine Spearman and Michael Smith worked, in 2001 after a covert police operation.
Smith, Payne and Catherine Spearman pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud last year.
by John Davies
Have your say in the Printweek Poll
Related stories
Latest comments
"I have worked in quite a few print sectors, including Walstead in the past. It is all tough, but most will not be surprised that the packaging sector is still growing. However, the service in the..."
""longer run litho work had “now returned to the Far East”?
Is this happening a lot?"
"Thanks Jo, look forward to reading it in due course. Administrators generally argue that they need to act with lightning speed in order to protect the business/jobs, thereby overlooking the fact that..."
Up next...
Revenue up to £3.2m, profits quadupled
Footprint picks up pace of acquisition strategy with Swindon’s C3
Controversy emerges over relationship with potential suitor
National World shares soar on takeover approach
24/7 access for customers
Bakergoodchild launches new SaaS platform
Strategic move for global growth