Judge Rivlin QC told the jury, of nine men and three women, that they had to decide whether Spearmen had knowingly been involved in the conspiracy to defraud. The jury had not been sent out to consider its verdict as PrintWeek went to press.
The prosecution alleges that Richard Spearman made 200,000 from illegal share trading from 1997 to 2001. The information came from an employee of St Ives financial printer Burrups, Norman Payne, who passed on proofs to Richard Spearmans wife Catherine and her business partner Michael Smith.
Smith, Payne and Catherine Spearman pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud last year.
by John Davies
Have your say in the Printweek Poll
Related stories
Latest comments
"Following content from the EcoVadis website:
<i>An EcoVadis medal or badge is NOT a certification or an endorsement of a company or its products or services, and it does not indicate that the..."
"Lee De’ath, starting to feel typecast in the insolvency department? Fancy a change in a career? Children's entertainer maybe?"
"Fantastic investment its great to see."
Up next...
Industry's night of nights
Printweek Awards 2025 shortlist revealed
Popular LinkedIn post
Direct mail ‘uniquely effective’, says Ogilvy UK’s Sutherland
Upgrades cut patching more than 50%
Bobst pushes upgrades for Expertcut 106 PER following Drupa reveal
"A fantastic opportunity"