Judge Rivlin QC told the jury, of nine men and three women, that they had to decide whether Spearmen had knowingly been involved in the conspiracy to defraud. The jury had not been sent out to consider its verdict as PrintWeek went to press.
The prosecution alleges that Richard Spearman made 200,000 from illegal share trading from 1997 to 2001. The information came from an employee of St Ives financial printer Burrups, Norman Payne, who passed on proofs to Richard Spearmans wife Catherine and her business partner Michael Smith.
Smith, Payne and Catherine Spearman pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud last year.
by John Davies
Have your say in the Printweek Poll
Related stories
Latest comments
"All these guys do is party all day and night. How do I join?"
"That's if they go into Administration, there are many of us still waiting for them to put 1066 Capital t/s Crystal Press in, since May 2024 we are all owed notice & redundancy pay and also..."
"Is a pre-pack looming?"
Up next...

Over 4,000 booksellers taking part
World Book Day 2025 encourages readers to ‘Read Your Way’

With new long sheet option
Printed Easy signs for second Canon iX3200

198 first-time and returning exhibitors
Fespa reveals exhibitor line-up for flagship Global Print Expo

Committed to removing 1bn units of plastic by end of FY27/28