Judge Rivlin QC told the jury, of nine men and three women, that they had to decide whether Spearmen had knowingly been involved in the conspiracy to defraud. The jury had not been sent out to consider its verdict as PrintWeek went to press.
The prosecution alleges that Richard Spearman made 200,000 from illegal share trading from 1997 to 2001. The information came from an employee of St Ives financial printer Burrups, Norman Payne, who passed on proofs to Richard Spearmans wife Catherine and her business partner Michael Smith.
Smith, Payne and Catherine Spearman pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud last year.
by John Davies
Have your say in the Printweek Poll
Related stories
Latest comments
"Is a pre-pack looming?"
"Many of us designers create artwork for mixed media campagins (such as print, social media, digital billboards). Keeping images in RGB and letting the RIP convert saves a lot of time and energy rather..."
"Excellent news on both productivity and sustainability; great to see Acorn investing to deliver a better outcome for both into the future. Well done 🙌🙌🙌"
Up next...
New sites planned
Blue Sky Printing eyes further expansion as it turns 10
Third straight quarter of revenue growth
HP plans up to 2,000 job cuts to secure against macro threats; posts 2.4% growth
Double install
