So, while many employers may find it frustrating that new laws will give agency workers more rights in the workplace, on a human level it has actually been a long time coming.
In the printing industry, agency workers are most often found in binderies and press halls, where assistants usually work on ‘zero-hour contracts’, under which an employer does not guarantee the employee a fixed number of hours per week. Rather, the employee is expected to be on-call and receive compensation only for hours worked.
In virtually all cases, agency workers are paid less and do not enjoy any of the employment benefits of permanent employees.
Agency workers are also, disproportionately often, women, ethnic minorities and migrant workers – the most vulnerable workers in the UK. They are also the people the least likely to be able to defend themselves. From my experience, I know some are terrified of joining a union out of fear of not being given any further work; this is the UK in the 21st century, truly astounding.
Equal treatment
The roots of the Agency Workers Directive, and now the regulations, are an attempt to protect the most vulnerable. The ‘equal treatment’ after 12 weeks in the job, is not as good as it should be, but is better than it was, but the inevitable consequence is that more people will be employed on a permanent basis and enjoy the same security and benefits as a permanent employee.
Although it is often unspoken, we know that some printers use agency workers on a long-term basis specifically to avoid the costs associated with full-time staff and to make it easier to increase and decrease numbers quickly and cheaply; so any law that increases the number of permanent employees in the sector is more than welcome.
We also know that some employers are already doing their best to circumvent the legislation; they are changing existing arrangements and asking agency workers to sign derogations.
The legal advice that agencies and employers are receiving is very premature bearing in mind case law is yet to be established, but of course it will be the agency and the employer that take the risk and not the lawyer.
Unite will challenge dubious practises in court and, where the regulations are ignored or circumvented, it will take companies to task through procedure and, if necessary, ballot members to take action to support their colleagues.
While employers may have to make changes to adapt to this directive, ultimately it has been brought in to give a large number of people employed in the UK basic rights, the key word there is basic, at the end of the day nobody should be expected to work with anything less.
Steve Sibbald is national officer at Unite
Have your say in the Printweek Poll
Related stories
Latest comments
"Well done all involved... great to see the investment to increase the productivity in the same footprint- much more sustainable than popping another one up."
"From 1949 until the late 2000s Remploy had a network of government-subsidised factories that offered employment specifically to disabled people, originally often war veterans or victims of industrial..."
"Does appear an odd decision as with that level of shareholder funds they would be liable for the staff redundancy and cover the insolvency costs. It’s not like they could take the money and dodge..."
Up next...
Andrew Whyte takes reins
MBO at LT Print Group ensures smooth transition
Educational day in Yorkshire
Northern Stationers see historic print and more in York
Supporting growth in new and existing markets
WTTB backs digital intentions with new e-commerce specialist
Investment in e-commerce fulfilment