I only ask because this week we caught wind of a trade business forms printer trying to undercut a printer customer by sending an unsolicited quote to the end client. Talk about biting the hand that feeds you.
I guess this could simply be the action of one over-enthusiastic sales person scrambling around to massage their end-of-month figures rather than a systematic strategy of the trade printer. However, if it is a strategy it’s a seriously dangerous one – I can’t imagine any printer that has been stitched up by one of its trade brethren would use that firm again in a hurry.
Clearly I haven’t named the trade printer in question because, well, I’d prefer to think it was the misguided actions of a maverick sales rep rather than the Machiavellian machinations of the director in charge. However, should this prove to be the latter and more people come forward then, once the PrintWeek legal eagles are satisfied, we would happily name and shame.
Of course, I’m confident that the vast majority of trade printers are beacons of morality and would never stoop to poaching their customers’ customers and serve an important role in the industry, but if you’ve been affected by a rogue supplier contacting your clients directly then get in touch.
After all, business is tough enough as it is without having to worry about being stabbed in the back by your suppliers.
Darryl Danielli is editor of PrintWeek
Have your say in the Printweek Poll
Related stories
Latest comments
"Utilities, paper and ink but probably not transport, couriers, finisher’s for example"
"Bound to be, most likely those not key suppliers along with HMRC"
"And now watch for those reversion charges to come in thick and fast, for the slightest deviation from the mailing specification 😉😂"
Up next...
Expected to complete Q1 2025
RRD to acquire Williams Lea
Launched earlier this year
Format Graphics in world-first Agfa Jeti Bronco install
No joy finding strategic partner
Expansion fuelled CB Printforce UK collapse
Anticipated to close Q1 2025