During a panel at the National Postal Forum in San Diego, Phoenix Marketing International President Leon Majors said the survey earlier this year of more than 5,000 US households found that 71% of people still open print financial statements and bills mailed to them, while 65% said they actually preferred to get a print copy of their bill or statement.
Majors added that while more and more Americans are switching over to electronic bill payments, there's still a sizable portion who show no inclination to change. "Right now there are about 25% of households that don't do electronic payments of any kind," he added. "So there are opportunities for paper-based billers."
Majors added the flurry of recent news stories of massive identify theft is slowing consumer interest in shifting exclusively to online bill paying. "The more security breaches there are the more people prefer paper," he said. "Currently 37% of all respondents said mail was still their primary method of paying bills and that's 38m households who prefer mail to pay bills."
For companies whose customers are aged 50 and up, the percentage is appreciably higher, Majors added.
Majors also delivered some good news for the check printing industry, noting despite predictions that checks will soon become completely obsolete, Americans still wrote a staggering 25bn checks last year.
On the same panel, Steve Monteith, USPS manager of transactions and correspondence mail, noted that 73% of bills and statements are still sent by mail and with good reason. "It gets read," he said. "More than 95% of transaction mail is opened."
Looking to drive the growth of transpromo mail that combines bills or statements with promotional materials, Monteith also said the USPS is considering boosting the additional weight companies can send as part of the Reply Rides Free program from 1.5oz to 2oz. Reply Ride Free enables billers to add promotions and other messages to statements and bills and receive rebates for the additional weight provided they meet growth targets.
Have your say in the Printweek Poll
Related stories
Latest comments
"From 1949 until the late 2000s Remploy had a network of government-subsidised factories that offered employment specifically to disabled people, originally often war veterans or victims of industrial..."
"Does appear an odd decision as with that level of shareholder funds they would be liable for the staff redundancy and cover the insolvency costs. It’s not like they could take the money and dodge..."
"It always felt that the Labour government were between a rock and a hard place with regard to fixing the mess they were left by the Tories. They have minimal wiggle room and, though not ideal, it..."
Up next...
Lamina Fasline arrived in September
MRP invests £1.8m in new press and mounter
Over 2,800 organisations challenged globally
Two Sides reports rising greenwash cases and campaign success
Founded in 1884