A Protective Award of 90 days pay, the maximum the law can provide, was awarded after the tribunal found that receivers Ernst & Young had failed to consult with both the GPMU and Amicus before announcing the redundancies.
At the time, GPMU deputy general secretary Tony Burke had said the redundancies, which amounted to a quarter of the workforce, were totally ruthless.
Burke said the result was a vindication of the unions decision to take legal action.
The behaviour of Ernst & Young was appalling, with many members dismissed at a moments notice, he said.
The former employees were based at Imperial Home Dcors Crown Wallcoverings plant in Darwen, Lancashire.
Crown Wallcoverings went into administrative receivership in last this year with the loss of 212 jobs.
The company appointed Ernst & Young as administrative receivers, after a restructuring of its business failed to leave it with enough adequate working capital to keep it trading.
by Andy Scott
Have your say in the Printweek Poll
Related stories
Latest comments
"I have worked in quite a few print sectors, including Walstead in the past. It is all tough, but most will not be surprised that the packaging sector is still growing. However, the service in the..."
""longer run litho work had “now returned to the Far East”?
Is this happening a lot?"
"Thanks Jo, look forward to reading it in due course. Administrators generally argue that they need to act with lightning speed in order to protect the business/jobs, thereby overlooking the fact that..."
Up next...
Revenue up to £3.2m, profits quadupled
Footprint picks up pace of acquisition strategy with Swindon’s C3
Controversy emerges over relationship with potential suitor
National World shares soar on takeover approach
24/7 access for customers
Bakergoodchild launches new SaaS platform
Strategic move for global growth